What Is Enlightenment? Stages of Awakening ExplainedBy Tchiki Davis, M.A., Ph.D.
*This page may include affiliate links; that means we earn from qualifying purchases of products.
Yet when we look more closely, both experientially and developmentally, enlightenment turns out to be far more nuanced. What people call enlightenment is not one single thing. It is not a uniform experience, and it does not unfold the same way for everyone. Enlightenment is deeply subjective, shaped by psychological development, cognitive capacity, emotional maturity, and the depth to which perception has reorganized itself.
This is why it can be helpful to speak of enlightenment not as a destination, but rather to use a framework of enlightenment stages. Awakening changes perception, identity, and meaning-making in distinct ways over time. The difference between pre-awakening and post-awakening is dramatic, but there are also large shifts that occur all throughout the later stages of awakening. These shifts matter, especially when people attempt to guide or teach others. Get The FREE Awakening eBook✓ Discover what awakening is like
✓ Learn about the four stages between awakening & enlightenment ✓ Get exercises to progress Sign up below to get our FREE eBook. What Is Enlightenment?At its simplest, enlightenment can be described as seeing through assumed reality—seeing that reality is a dream, you might say. What we normally experience as a solid individual located inside a solid world is revealed to be a construction. Thoughts, emotions, sensations, and perceptions arise, but this is all part of the dream. In fact, it is exactly what makes the dream seem real.
Difficulty with Definitions This definition only scratches the surface. Seeing through reality happens in layers. Early on, it may feel like discovering that you are awareness rather than the mind. Later, it may involve seeing that even awareness is not a thing. Eventually, even the sense of being someone who understands enlightenment (or anything else) dissolves. This layered nature is why enlightenment cannot be reduced to a single insight, moment, or definition. Each stage brings its own clarity and its own distortions. What feels complete at one stage may later be seen as partial. What looked like clarity will later been seen to be illusion. What looked like truth at earlier stages will later be seen to be false. The Paradox of Self Ken Wilber’s work on 'waking up' versus 'growing up' helps make more sense of this. Awakening (no-self awareness) and development (self-awareness) are not two. They are part of one nondual process that includes cognitive complexity, emotional integration, relational capacity, ethical maturity, and the paradoxical understanding that none of these actually exist. Thus, two people may recognize no self, yet interpret and live that recognition very differently depending on their stage of self-development. Overview of The Four Stages of EnlightenmentStage 0: Pre Awakening
Seeing the Self-Concept Before awakening, life is lived almost entirely through identification with thought. Identity is constructed from beliefs, roles, memories, emotions, and social conditioning. There is a strong sense of being a self inside a world, navigating reality as something external and often unpleasant. In this stage, happiness is usually pursued through external achievements, relationships, or altered internal states. While moments of satisfaction occur, they do not last, because they depend on conditions that are always changing. Suffering arises not only from painful experiences, but from the constant effort required to maintain a coherent self narrative. Pre-awakening often includes curiosity about the mind itself. People may investigate psychology, meditation, philosophy, or spirituality in an attempt to understand who they are. This inquiry lays the groundwork for the first major shift. Stage 1: The Initial Awakening Witnessing Awareness Stage 1 is often described as a radical change in perspective. Instead of experiencing yourself as the character in the story, you start to experience yourself as the one behind the story. Interestingly, for those in earlier stages of self-development, this seems to manifest as identification with the 'higher self'; for those in later stages of development, it is often experienced more as identification with an impersonal witness awareness. Both point to the same thing: A 'big' self that is wiser and less attached to the difficulties of the 'small self'. What Is This Stage? This stage is sometimes called stream entry or kensho. It brings a huge sense of spaciousness and relief. Much of the habitual suffering tied to self judgment loosens, because thoughts are no longer taken personally in the same way. However, the ego has not disappeared. It has become objectified. Many identifications remain. In other words, we still feel like various aspects of self and reality are true. While this is a genuine awakening (or an early stage of enlightenment), many people mistake this stage for full enlightenment. Stage 2: Deconstructing Reality Deepening Awakening In Stage 2, the initial ease of awakening gives way to a more destabilizing process. The mind starts to see through its remaining thoughts, beliefs, and emotional patterns. Meaning structures start to dissolve. Old motivations fall away. People may feel empty, disoriented, or lonely as familiar ways of orienting to life collapse. Psychological material that was previously managed by the ego can surface more intensely. Crucially, even the identity of the Witness identity begins to unravel. The realization dawns that awareness itself has been subtly conceptualized. The sense of being a stable observer is seen as another construct and begins to be viewed as another object appearing in All That Is. This stage can feel unsettling, but without this deconstruction, nonduality remains a conceptual idea rather than a lived reality. Stage 3: Perceptual Nonduality The Dissolution of Boundaries In Stage 3, the collapse of self-structures often lead one through the fear barrier and into perceptual nonduality (the dissolution of phassa and āyatana - sense fields/sense bases). In other words, the boundaries held within the 5 senses begin to dissolve. The external world actually looks and sounds like a dream. This stage involves navigating paradox. There is recognition of no self, yet self continues seamlessly. One begins to release some of the body's attachments, mostly to aspects of the small self that have already been seen through consciously. Moving Beyond Stage 3 Here, self-development really matters. The experience of no-self requires that there still be a concept of self. And it is not until the Construct-Aware and Unitive Stages of self-development that it becomes obvious that self and no-self are the same thing. It seems that these developmental stages are required to get to stage 4. In late stage 3, concepts no longer operate (the dissolution of Nāmarūpa). There is no longer truth held in any concept—not love, not wisdom, not truth, not meditation, not practice, not even enlightenment. Any word applied to anything is no longer means anything. The deepening of this recognition moves one towards post-conceptual nonduality. In The Law of One framework, this is likely the transition from 5D to 6D. Stage 4: Full Enlightenment Post-Conceptual Nonduality What might be called full enlightenment is not simply the absence of self or feeling like you're living in a hologram. It is what happens after the conceptual integration of no-self and self-development. Self and no self are no longer concepts that are experienced as two. Pretty soon, nothing is experienced as two, or dual. The collapse of the conceptual frameworks that create apparent reality leads into post-conceptual nonduality (the dissolution of the Sanskaras that hold Viññāṇa, or witness consciousness, in place). The result is 'not knowing', or Avijjā. Misunderstandings The vast majority of people mistake perceptual nonduality for post-conceptual nonduality because they think beliefs are the fundamental level of conceptual reality, but there several more subtler layers of conceptual reality—namely, the conceptual definitions themselves and the fabricating mechanisms that allow concepts to arise. When these fall away, there is nothing left. Not even the awareness that observes the nonduality. Simply isness. The Dissolution of Nonduality Earlier on, I thought that Nāmarūpa was Avijjā, but Nāmarūpa is more like a really deep belief—it's the belief that any concept is real. It is the seeing that when we use any word, it doesn't actually point to anything. Avijjā is sort of like the embodiment of Nāmarūpa. 'Understanding' no longer arises because there is nothing left to understand with or from. There are no more answers because the mind has dissolved the tools that create apparent knowing. Thus, even the knowing of nonduality (as the opposite of duality) can not survive. Overview of the Stages of Enlightenment
Enlightenment as a Developmental SpectrumFrom the perspective of everythingness, there are infinite perspectives, and enlightenment can not be defined as one solid thing. All stages of awakening can be called enlightenment, as long as we are clear about what appears to be real and what distortions remain.
Functionally, this seems to be the best use of this term. Enlightenment includes many different things but becomes fewer and fewer things over time. Someone in Stage 2 cannot reliably guide someone in Stage 3, because their perception of reality includes more. This is not a judgment. It is simply a recognition that one's perspective matters. Beyond The Term "Enlightenment" From the perspective of nothingness, there are no real perspectives, and enlightenment still can not be defined as a solid thing. Here, the concept of enlightenment, and it's experiential reality, no longer makes logical sense. Then, when these perspectives merge and become everythingness = nothingness, even the experiential reality of enlightenment dissolves such that reality just Is, with no mental/conceptual distinctions left. Integrating Other MapsAnother way to understand these stages is through the map of dependent origination (paṭicca samuppāda). The nidanas (or stages of dependent origination) describe the mechanism by which a sense of self and world continually regenerate and appear real. From this view, enlightenment is not the attainment of a new experience, but the progressive exhaustion of the mechanisms that create the different aspects of apparent reality.
These mechanisms exhaust roughly in the order, but often go through layers of deepening. Experiential Map of Dependent Origination Dissolution Upādāna dissolving → Clinging or grasping to external objects lessens. There's no longer a holding onto external experiences or objects as tools to make one happy. For example, one sees that no amount of money and no perfect experience will ever satisfy them. Taṇhā dissolving → Craving. Once one sees that no objects or outside experience can satisfy them, one stops seeking these. Why both getting richer, going on fancy vacations, or looking for the perfect relationship is these things wont actually make you happier? Eventually we see that even internal experiences (like the feelings of peace or bliss) don't make us happy and so we even stop clinging to and craving internal experiences. Vedanā dissolving → The hedonic tone of experience (pleasant, unpleasant) ceases to function. The feeling tone (or emotion) is seen to be a conceptual overlap. Experience no longer has the flavor of being good or bad. Without this emotional quality, there's nothing left to crave or cling to. Phassa dissolving → The subject-object structure of experience becomes transparent. The world takes on a mirage-like or holographic quality as the mental mechanisms that connect the 5 senses to outside world no longer arise. The illusion of solid, external reality (and the sense of living in space) is seen through. Āyatana dissolving → The 5 senses (plus mind) lose their distinct boundaries. Sound, sight, sensation, smell, taste, and mental impressions are no longer experienced as separate channels. The assumption that the senses provide an accurate reflection of what reality "actually is" collapses. Experience becomes an undifferentiated field of sensation. Nāmarūpa dissolving → Concepts and labels stop seeming like they point to actual, discrete things. The mind-created division between "name" (concept/label) and "form" (the physical or mental object that is labeled) is revealed as a fabrication that never corresponded to reality. At this point, nothing means anything. And eventually it is seen that even witnessing awareness is just a label for a conceptual 'form' and not actually real. Viññāṇa dissolving → The belief that there is a real witnessing awareness observing a real world disappears. There's no longer a sense of awareness "here" experiencing phenomena "there." Awareness arises and ceases just like all other phenomena in All That Is. Saṅkhāra dissolving → The habitual mental mechanisms that construct apparent continuity of awareness (and thus experiences) dissolve. Things like time, causality, and narrative coherence—the mental mechanisms that connect this moment to that moment no longer arise. Avijjā dissolving → The assumption that reality is fundamentally knowable collapses. Without the sanskaras that generate the 'knowing' function of awareness, nothing can be known. The search for answers ceases because there's no awareness left to know it. Experiential Map of Dependent Origination Dissolution
How These Maps Clarify One Another
When seen together, these models describe the same unfolding from different angles:
They converge on a single insight: enlightenment is not a moment, not a belief, and not a final experience. It is the progressive disabling of the machinery that produces a self in a world. From this view, awakening deepens not by adding insight, but by subtracting the conditions that make misperception possible in the first place. The Illusion of Being “Done”A common belief is that enlightenment has a point of completion. Statements like “I’m done” or “you’ll know when you’re finished” seem true, especially from the perspective of deep 5D insight. In 5D, one might genuinely feel they've penetrated all the important truths and completed the journey. That feeling is real and valid at that level and it may, in fact, be the end of 5D. In a very real way, they have seen all "truths". But "truth" is still arising within a framework that has meaning and can be observed by witnessing awareness.
So, if your mind tells you "you're done", that's just a thought/belief structure (which still operates at 5D). That statement itself reveals that the meaning-making mechanisms (of 6D) are still operating. There's still a process called "enlightenment" that 'one' can 'feel' is complete. There is still something that can be known (i.e., the experience of completion). From 7D consciousness (in The Law of One framework), the very notion of "done-ness" is a conceptual overlay—a thought structure. The feeling that 'done-ness' is still the fabricating function of sanskara. In the gateway to 7D, there is no more ability to grasp the thoughts or even witness experiences such as "I understand" or "I've arrived" or "I'm done". Final Thoughts on Enlightenment as ProcessEnlightenment can be described as seeing through the dream. But that seeing has layers. What appears complete at one stage reveals itself as partial at the next.
Rather than a single event, enlightenment is an ongoing unfolding that includes awakening, deconstruction, embodiment, and sanskaric exhaustion. It is subjective, developmental, and deeply influenced by the psychological self. Calling all stages enlightenment is not a problem, as long as we are clear about what stage we are referring to. Clarity prevents confusion, distortion, and misplaced authority. |
Get The FREE eBook
✓ Discover what awakening is like ✓ Learn about the four stages between awakening & enlightenment ✓ Get exercises to progress Sign up to get our FREE eBook. |