Thoughts & The Gap Between Thoughts: Two Paths to Emptiness

By Tchiki Davis, M.A., Ph.D.
*This page may include affiliate links; that means we earn from qualifying purchases of products.

The Enlightenment Map > Stage 0 > Thoughts & The Gap

Thoughts & The Gap Between Thoughts: Two Paths to Emptiness

Most of us live our entire lives identified with the stream of mental activity running through our heads. We take thoughts to be reality itself, beliefs to be truth, and the thinking mind to be who we fundamentally are. But contemporary psychology points to something profound: reality reveals itself by either path: either by finding the spaces between thoughts or by looking deeply into thoughts themselves.

Both paths lead to the same discovery, though they approach it from different angles. One path finds freedom in the gaps, the other finds freedom in examining what fills the gaps. Understanding both approaches offers a more complete picture of how awakening unfolds and what it actually means to see through the constructed nature of self.

Get The FREE Awakening eBook

✓ Discover what awakening is like
✓ Learn about the four stages between awakening & enlightenment
✓ Get exercises to progress

Sign up below to get our FREE eBook.

What Are the Gaps Between Thoughts?

The gaps between thoughts are exactly what they sound like: brief moments when mental activity ceases, when no thought is present. If you've ever sat in meditation and watched your mind, you've likely noticed that thoughts don't form an unbroken stream. They arise, linger for a moment, and disappear. Between one thought's ending and another's beginning, there exists a space, sometimes barely perceptible, sometimes more obvious.

These gaps aren't voids or absences in any negative sense. They're moments of pure awareness without content, consciousness without an object. In these brief openings, something becomes available that the thinking mind typically obscures: a quality of presence that exists independent of mental activity, a stillness that isn't created by effort but revealed when mental noise temporarily subsides.

Most people dismiss these gaps as meaningless pauses, but contemplative traditions recognize them as portals to deeper understanding. The gaps show us that consciousness doesn't require thought to exist. Awareness is present whether thoughts are happening or not. This simple recognition carries profound implications for how we understand ourselves and reality.

The Traditional Path: Finding Stillness in the Gap

Spiritual practices from Buddhist vipassana to Christian contemplative prayer to Hindu meditation share a common technique: watching the mind until the spaces between thoughts become apparent. This approach has guided seekers for thousands of years because it works. When we rest attention in these gaps, we discover something that feels more real, more fundamental than the constant chatter of thinking.

The experience of resting in the gap between thoughts often brings a quality of peace that thinking never provides. There's a stillness that is often a positive presence, alive and aware. Practitioners describe touching something infinite in these moments, a consciousness that witnesses thoughts but clearly isn't made of thoughts. The gap reveals what many traditions call pure awareness, the observer, or witness consciousness.

Widening The Gap
As meditation deepens, these gaps tend to lengthen. What begins as fleeting glimpses becomes more sustained. You might sit in meditation and realize that several seconds, even minutes, have passed without a single thought arising. During these periods, awareness remains fully present and clear. You haven't fallen asleep or zoned out. You're simply resting in consciousness itself, without the usual mental chatter.

This discovery leads many practitioners to a profound shift in identity. If awareness exists when thoughts are absent, then what we truly are cannot be the thinking mind. The constant inner narrator we've taken ourselves to be is revealed as content within consciousness, not consciousness itself. This recognition is often initiates our initial awakening because it shows that the self we imagined ourselves to be, the character in our story defined by memories and thoughts and beliefs, isn't ultimately real. It's a construction, a pattern of mental activity.

The gaps between thoughts become proof that we are not our thoughts. They demonstrate directly, not conceptually, that consciousness precedes mental content. For many seekers, this becomes the entire path: find the gap, rest there, and recognize your true nature as the awareness in which thoughts appear and disappear.

The Less Traveled Path: Looking Into The Mind

But Susanne Cook-Greuter's research on ego development reveals another possibility, one that contemplative traditions have given less attention. While it seems obvious that deeper truth lies beyond thought, in the gaps, Cook-Greuter's developmental framework suggests that we can also look into thoughts, beliefs, and concepts themselves. If we examine mental content closely enough, we discover the same emptiness that the gaps reveal.

This path doesn't seek to transcend thought but to understand it so thoroughly that its constructed, insubstantial nature becomes obvious. Rather than looking past thoughts to what lies beyond them, we look directly at thoughts themselves and ask: what actually are these things?

Start Looking at Your Thoughts
Start with a simple observation. Where do thoughts come from? Right now, as you read this, thoughts are arising. But did you create them? Did you sit down and consciously construct each thought before it appeared? Obviously not. Thoughts simply arise, unbidden and unplanned. You don't think thoughts; thoughts think themselves. They emerge from some unknown source, present themselves to awareness, and dissolve back into that same unknown.

In post-conventional stages of development (i.e., Individualist stage/perspective aware), we can objectively observe thoughts and perspectives and discover the experience of thinking contains no actual thinker. There's just thinking happening, thoughts appearing and disappearing like waves on an ocean. We tell ourselves a story that "I am thinking these thoughts," but direct observation shows otherwise. There's no separate entity standing apart from the thought stream, controlling it.

What We Find in Thought
When we watch thoughts closely, something else becomes apparent: their content rarely makes much sense. We imagine our thoughts as coherent, logical, meaningful. But honest observation reveals repetitive phrases, half-formed images, disconnected associations. One moment you're thinking about what to make for dinner, the next you're remembering something your friend said last week, then you're imagining a conversation that might happen tomorrow, then you notice a sound and think about where it came from. There's no real continuity, no actual logic connecting these mental events. They're simply arising and passing, a chaotic stream we retrospectively organize into a narrative.

Get Support

Book a Session

The Nature of Beliefs

In later stages of development (i.e., autonomous or context-aware), we can examine beliefs themselves. Beliefs feel different from ordinary thoughts. They seem more solid, more true, more foundational. And they don't usually exist as a stream or words running through the mind. We take our beliefs to represent reality accurately. But where do beliefs actually come from?

Start Looking at Your Beliefs
The uncomfortable truth is that we don't choose our beliefs through careful, rational evaluation. Beliefs arise from circumstances: the family we were born into, the culture we inhabit, the particular experiences we've had, the era in history we live in. In other words, they arise from context.

When you become context-aware, you see that if you had been born to different parents in a different country at a different time, you would hold different beliefs. This doesn't mean beliefs are necessarily false, but it reveals they aren't chosen. They're perspectives we've inherited and absorbed, then claimed as our own conclusions.

How Beliefs Form
Watch how beliefs actually form. Something happens, and interpretation arises automatically. You don't sit down and carefully weigh evidence before forming a belief about what that experience meant. The belief just appears, fully formed, feeling true and obvious. Only later, if challenged, do we construct rational justifications for beliefs that were never rationally chosen in the first place.

Here's what's especially revealing: when we hold any belief tightly, we automatically suppress its opposite. Believing strongly in one political position requires pushing away the opposing view. Identifying with one role or identity means rejecting others. Every firmly held belief creates a fixed position, and that fixed position limits what we can see, what we can experience, what becomes possible. We become trapped by our own certainties.

The Fluidity of Concepts

In late stages of development (i.e., construct-aware stage), we can go even deeper and examine concepts, the basic building blocks we use to organize reality. Pick any concept: love, success, justice, self, happiness, freedom. These feel like solid realities, objective things that exist independent of our thinking about them. But look closely. How do you define love? How does your neighbor define it? How did you define it ten years ago compared to now?

Concepts Are Empty Too
Every concept is defined differently by each person. Your understanding of success differs from someone else's understanding. Even within your own experience, concepts shift and change as you grow and encounter new perspectives. What you once called success might now seem hollow. What you once dismissed might now seem valuable. The concept has changed!

If concepts were pointing to solid, unchanging realities "out there," they wouldn't be so fluid, so contextual, so dependent on the person using them. The fact that concepts mean different things to different people, and change meaning even within a single person's life, reveals something crucial: concepts don't correspond to fixed realities. They're mental constructs, useful tools for organizing experience but ultimately empty of any inherent existence.

This applies even to the concept of self. We take "self" to be the most obvious, undeniable reality. Of course there's a self; here I am.

How The No-Self Awareness & Self-Awareness Paths Differ

➤ When you are on the path of "no-self awareness", you look closely at what you mean by self, you find it's actually a collection of concepts, memories, beliefs, sensations, thoughts. The realization is that there is no solid, unchanging self that exists across time. The self is seen to be assembled from various elements, constantly shifting and redefining itself. Although it's clear that there no solid self made of concepts and beliefs, concepts and beliefs, themselves, can still seem real.

➤ When you are on the path of "self-awareness", you look closely at the concepts themselves, including the self-concept. The realization isn't necessarily that there is no self. The realization is that the bits (or concepts) that make up the self are empty. The self is seen to be assembled from various elements that never had any solidity to begin with. Although it's clear that the self is made of empty, unreal pieces, one may still experience being a self moving through time.

Eventually, the two paths merge into what some refer to as Unitive Stage.

Two Types of Awakening

Most people who experience awakening do so through the first path: discovering emptiness in the gaps between mental processes. They realize that the self they imagined themselves to be is just a pattern of mental activity, not an actual entity. This is the classic contemplative realization, documented across traditions for centuries.

Finding Truth Beyond Thought or Within Thought
But emptiness can also be found by looking directly into mental processes themselves. This second path examines thoughts, beliefs, and concepts so thoroughly that their constructed, insubstantial nature becomes obvious. Rather than transcending thought to find truth beyond it, this path sees through thought to recognize truth within it.

This might be called the path of self-awareness, though that term requires careful understanding. At earlier stages of development, it is the awareness of more and more aspects of self, but with deep enough looking, the awareness sees that the apparent self is constructed from empty elements.

In Duality, The Two Paths Appear Separate
Research by Ken Wilber and others suggests these two types of awareness develop independently, and that is largely true. Someone might have profound experiences of resting in the gap between thoughts, touching states of pure consciousness, while still being completely trapped by unexamined beliefs and concepts. They may even find no-self, which arises in nonduality, beyond the experience of spacious awareness, but they still haven't seen though the meaning-making function of the mind.

Conversely, someone might become highly sophisticated at recognizing the constructed nature of beliefs and concepts, seeing through the stories mind tells, while struggling to rest in the gaps between thoughts.

Both paths are valid. Both lead toward freedom. But neither is complete without the other.

Two Paths to Emptiness: A Comparison

Dimension	Gap Between Thoughts Path	Looking Into Thought Path
Primary Focus	Spaces where thought temporarily ceases.	Thoughts, beliefs, and concepts themselves.
Method	Resting attention in stillness and silence.	Close examination of mental content and meaning.
Key Discovery	Awareness exists without thought.	Thoughts and concepts are empty constructions.
Sense of Self	Identity shifts from thinker to witness.	The thinker is seen to never have existed.
Common Pitfall	Re-identifying with awareness as a subtle self.	Over-intellectualizing emptiness.
Developmental Emphasis	No-self awareness.	Self-awareness through construct examination.
Unitive Integration	Gaps are seen as conceptual distinctions.	Deconstruction occurs without a doer.

When the Two Paths Converge

Eventually, with deepening realization, the two paths merge into what developmental theorists like Cook-Greuter call the Unitive Stage. This isn't simply having both types of awareness operate side by side. It's the recognition that the distinction between them was always artificial.

Going from No-Self to Self-Awareness
At the Unitive Stage, something shifts fundamentally. The person who has rested deeply in no-self awareness begins to notice concepts they haven't questioned, even the meaning-making structures they've taken for granted, are also empty. They see that "awareness" itself is a concept, that practices that seemed effective are empty, and that even the ideas of truth, spirituality, and love are just ways of organizing experience. Everything is constructed and nothing is more real than anything else. The gap between thoughts and the "truth" found there are recognized as conceptual distinctions rather than any sort of ultimate reality.

Going from Self-Awareness to No-Self
Simultaneously, the person who has deconstructed concepts thoroughly begins to recognize that the very deconstruction is happening without a self, driver, or doer. The conceptual emptiness of all the individual bits points to something beyond the bits. The intellectual recognition of emptiness gives way to the lived experience of it.

Convergence
At this convergence point, both discoveries are seen as one coherent realization. The emptiness beyond thought and the emptiness within thought are no longer separate. They're two ways of looking at the same nondual everythingness. They only seem different when the meaning-making mind is still constructing apparent reality.

The mind stops trying to make meaning. It doesn't label things as "good" or "bad". It doesn't hold a belief that one practice works better than another. It doesn't see ultimate reality as anything more or less than conventional reality. Reality is no more love than it is hate. Truth is just as much spacious awareness as contracted unawareness. There are no spiritual teachers and students. There are no seekers and finders. These are all still conceptual labels which only appear to be real when the mind still believes that they are real.

What Remains
The Unitive Stage doesn't represent the end of development. Even calling it a stage is somewhat misleading, as it suggests a fixed attainment. But it does represent a significant shift where the apparent duality of self-awareness and no-self awareness dissolves. What seemed like two different approaches to truth are recognized as the same insight seen from different perspectives. And from here development continues.

Final Thoughts on The Gap & Two Paths

This recognition doesn't mean thoughts stop arising or that gaps between thoughts cease to matter. Mental activity continues. Sometimes there are thoughts, sometimes there are gaps. Sometimes attention rests in stillness, sometimes it's engaged with thinking. But the identification with either state dissolves. There's no longer someone trying to get to the gap, trying to transcend thought, trying to maintain awareness. There's just whatever is happening, recognized as complete without needing to be different.

What remains isn't easily described because description itself uses the very concepts being seen through. It's not awareness and it's not thoughts. It's not self and it's not no-self. It's not the gap and it's not what fills the gap. It's simply this, whatever is appearing right now, before we've named it or categorized it or understood it. And even calling it "this" is already one concept too many.

Want to chat with someone about your awakening?