Separation: What It Is and Where It Lives

By Tchiki Davis, M.A., Ph.D.
*This page may include affiliate links; that means we earn from qualifying purchases of products.

The Enlightenment Map > Stage 4 > Separation

Separation: What It Is and Where It Lives

Separation feels like one of the most fundamental aspects of human experience. There is a sense of “me” here and a world “out there.” There are thoughts, emotions, objects, and other people, all appearing distinct and independent. This sense of division shapes how we relate to everything, including ourselves.

Many spiritual paths begin with the assumption that separation is the core problem. If we could just dissolve it, we imagine that peace or enlightenment would finally arrive. The idea is simple and compelling: remove the sense of self, and the illusion of separation disappears. But in deeper nonduality, even this assumption gets questioned.

To understand separation, we need to look closely at what separation actually is, where it lives, and how it is created.

Get The FREE Awakening eBook

✓ Discover what awakening is like
✓ Learn about the four stages between awakening & enlightenment
✓ Get exercises to progress

Sign up below to get our FREE eBook.

What Is Separation?

Separation is the felt sense that things are distinct, bounded, and different from one another. It is the perception that there is a clear distinction between “this” and “that".

At first glance, this seems obvious. Of course things are separate. A tree is not a chair. A thought is not a sound. A person is not a table. I am not you.

But when we look more closely, this clarity begins to dissolve. What we call “separate things” are actually collections of sensations, perceptions, and mental labels. The mind organizes experience into categories and then treats those categories as real, solid entities.

Separation does not exist outside of the mind. It is not found in raw experience itself. What appears to be separation is actually just a byproduct of the mind (the brain) labeling, categorizing, sorting, sequencing, and conceptualizing our experience.

The Role of Reification

To understand how separation feels so real, it helps to explore a key process: reification.

Reification is the mental process of turning fluid, dynamic experience into solid “things.” A shifting pattern of color becomes a “tree.” A series of sensations becomes “my body.” A stream of thoughts becomes “me.”

This process is automatic and deeply ingrained. It allows us to navigate the world, communicate, and survive. But it also creates the illusion that these constructs, these separate things, are actually solid, separate, and real.

Dive Deeper Into Nonduality

Book a Session

The Search to End the Self

At some point, many people begin to question the nature of the self. They notice that the “me” they take for granted is difficult to pin down. Is it the body? The thoughts? The memories? The emotions?

This question or search becomes the mission of many spiritual communities. A drive to find the true self and to get rid of the false one. Or, the search to find that there is no self at all.

The Treadmill of Seeking No-Self
There is often an implicit belief that enlightenment requires the complete disappearance of the self. But what does that mean exactly? What is 'The Self'? Is it thoughts? beliefs? emotions? seeking? suffering? ownership? attachment?

Can you see how your search for no-self is dependent on your definition of self?

Nothing Needs to Happen (& Everything Does)

Different nonduality teachings will define different aspects of experience as “the self.” The seeking energy, the sense of ownership, the feeling of separation, and even the desire for awakening can all be labeled as self.

But these are just definitions. All of these are reifications of a concept (the self) making something out of nothing.

Self is Everything & Nothing
Every definition is arbitrary. Each person defines the self slightly differently, and none of these definitions are inherently more true than any other. So what, exactly, has to fall away for enlightenment?

You'll notice when listening to spiritual teachers that everyone's answer is different. Whatever fell away for them is what the self is. LOL. Doesn't that sound a lot like what a self would do? It would claim that it's experience of enlightenment is the TRUE one.

So does every aspect of the self need to fall away for enlightenment? Or do none of them?
The answer is: Both!

Nothing needs to happen. This is already everything. You are perfect as you are.
And yet, to move beyond separation, everything must fall away. And I don't just mean all parts of the self. I mean everything. Because the self, and everything else, are not actually separate. There is no difference between self and not-self so how is it even possible for the 'self' to "fall away" without everything else 'falling away' too?

The Self as Just Another Concept

There is a common tendency to treat the self as a special kind of illusion. It is often seen as the central problem, the root of suffering, or the obstacle to enlightenment. Even when aspects of the self are gone, there is generally still a duality where transcending 'the self' seems more important or relevant to enlightenment than transcending the idea of a sandwich. Any time there is more or less, good or bad, there is still duality.

The concept of 'self' is held separate in the mind and seen as a special kind of illusion. But the self is no different from any other idea or concept.

Consider the example of pizza.

Pizza is a collection of sensations: smell, taste, texture, appearance. These sensations are grouped together and labeled “pizza.”

The self works the exact same way.

It is a collection of sensations: thoughts, body feelings, memories. These are grouped together and labeled “me.”

Both are conceptual constructions; they are collections of apparent things held together by the mind. It is this held togetherness, this conceptual construction that is at the root, not the self. The self is just one, of many, conceptual constructions (a particularly unpleasant one though).

If someone delivered you a pizza made with a piece of bread lathered with butter and lettuce on top, you might be upset because, "That's not a pizza!" But pizza isn't actually a real thing. It is a concept. Literally anything could be part of a pizza. And literally anything could be part of a self.

Suffering Isn't In The Self; It Is In Concepts
The suffering does not come from the food or the self, but from reification of anything. Suffering is in the concept, belief, and experience that something IS actually what we think it is. You might say that suffering is in 'knowing' because in order to know anything, things have to separate in our minds.

How Concepts Create Suffering

We suffer because we hold our concepts to be true.

If you cling to the idea of respect, you can feel disrespected. If you cling to the idea of love, you can feel unloved. If you cling to the idea of enlightenment, you can feel unenlightened.

The self is not unique. It is true that the concept of seeking or attachment or ownership are more painful than the concept of a pizza. When seeking or attachment or ownership fall out of our experience, life can feel a lot more pleasant. But the apparent realness of any concept can create suffering.

By treating the self as a special problem, we maintain the duality that creates other forms of suffering. We overlook the broader pattern.

The Trap of Trying to Eliminate the Self

When the self is defined as something specific with specific qualities, a trap is created. The belief that X, Y, and Z aspects of the self need to disappear becomes another concept that appears real.

When the self is not reified (or seen to be anything in particular), it is everything and nothing. This presents a paradox:

There isn't actually any 'self' to transcend. There isn't any 'thing' to transcend.
Simultaneously, everything needs to be transcended, because anything could be the self.

No Such Thing As No-Self
In other words, nothing is truly separation and yet everything is. Those who say they have transcended certain experiences which are defined as 'self' still hold that definition of self to be true. There is still a concept of no-self that seems different than the experience of self. But if separation is everything (and nothing), then all of this is still illusion. No-self is still an idea and experience based on conceptual boundaries and reification.

The Collapse of Distinctions

At a deeper level, the issue is not the self itself, but the entire structure of distinction. The mind makes it seem like certain experiences are fundamentally different from others.

This is not limited to self versus other. It applies to all dualities: help and not-help, wisdom and not-wisdom, spiritual and non-spiritual, real versus unreal. The dualities themselves become transparent.

“This” is and always was “that.”

Not because they merge into a single thing, but because the mental processes that created distinction no longer operates.

Inquiry Into Distinction
What is a concept? It is literally just an arbitrary collection of things that are are grouped by the mind, and as a result appear to be a real thing.

For example, ask yourself, "What is fear?" Probably a mixture of beliefs, thoughts and sensations. But why? If you look for 'fear' can you actually find it?

There is a lot of fuss in the nonduality community about self-inquiry. If you look for the self, you can't actually find it. But the truth is that if you look for anything, you can't actually find it.

A Mind Trick
This is all just the way the mind (brain) works. All distinctions are is stitched together thoughts, labels, categories, hierarchies, and narratives into time, space, causation, identity, solidity, and realness. This mental construction gives rise to the sense of a solid world with separate objects and a separate self.

When these concepts are examined closely, it's obvious that nothing is real. Nothing has meaning. Nothing is separate. Nothing is caused. Separation is not found anywhere within this process AND it is everywhere and everything.

Final Thoughts on Separation

Separation turns out to be far less substantial than it first appears. It is not something that exists “out there” in reality, nor is it something located in a specific part of experience. It is the byproduct of how the mind organizes, labels, and defines what is happening.

When this is seen clearly, the focus naturally shifts. The self no longer stands out as a special problem to solve, and separation no longer appears as something that must be eliminated. Both are recognized as expressions of the same underlying process: conceptual construction.

Even the idea of “no-self” does not escape this. It is still a concept, still a distinction, still part of the same structure that creates separation. As long as one concept is held as more true, more important, or more real than another, the pattern continues.

When the mind’s habit of making distinctions begins to loosen, the entire structure of separation becomes transparent. Not just between self and other, but across all categories: real and unreal, spiritual and non-spiritual, this and that. These divisions are no longer convincing in the way they once were.

Want to chat about nondual awakening?